Health Care Reforms Taking Effect This Month

Several major aspects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or Health Care Reform, will take effect on September 23rd:

Extending Coverage for Young Adults

Under the new law, young adults will be allowed to stay on their parent’s plan until they turn 26 years old. (In the case of existing group health plans, this right does not apply if the young adult is offered insurance at work.) Some insurers began implementing this practice early. Check with your insurance company or employer to see if you qualify. Learn more about the young adults insurance policy.

Providing Free Preventative Care

All new plans must cover certain preventive services such as mammograms and colonoscopies without charging a deductible, co-pay or coinsurance. Learn more about preventive care benefits.

Prohibiting Insurance Companies from Rescinding Coverage

In the past, insurance companies could search for an error, or other technical mistake, on a customer’s application and use this error to deny payment for services when he or she got sick. The new law makes this illegal. After media reports cited incidents of breast cancer patients losing coverage, insurance companies agreed to end this practice immediately.

Appealing Insurance Company Decisions

The law provides consumers with a way to appeal coverage determinations or claims to their insurance company, and establishes an external review process.

Eliminating Lifetime Limits on Insurance Coverage

Under the new law, insurance companies will be prohibited from imposing lifetime dollar limits on essential benefits, like hospital stays.

Regulating Annual Limits on Insurance Coverage

Under the new law, insurance companies’ use of annual dollar limits on the amount of insurance coverage a patient may receive will be restricted for new plans in the individual market and all group plans. In 2014, the use of annual dollar limits on essential benefits like hospital stays will be banned for new plans in the individual market and all group plans.

Prohibiting Denying Coverage of Children Based on Pre-Existing Conditions

The new law includes new rules to prevent insurance companies from denying coverage to children under the age of 19 due to a pre-existing condition.

~HealthCare.gov

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks

Come to Our First Meeting!

College Democrats Meeting
Tuesday, August 31 @ 7pm
Busch Student Center – Senate Chambers
FREE PIZZA

Bring some friends and learn about the exciting events and opportunities we
are planning!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks

Proposition C Consequences

From the pages of The Progressive Billiken:

On August 3rd, Missouri voters passed Proposition C with over 70% of the vote. That was a mistake, and now Missourians will literally pay the consequences.

Proposition C reads as follows:

Shall the Missouri Statutes be amended to:

-Deny the government authority to penalize citizens for refusing to purchase private health insurance or infringe upon the right to offer or accept direct payment for lawful healthcare services?
-Modify laws regarding the liquidation of certain domestic insurance companies?

It is estimated this proposal will have no immediate costs or savings to state or local governmental entities. However, because of the uncertain interaction of the proposal with implementation of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, future costs to state governmental entities are unknown.

Yes – For the Proposition
No – Against the Proposition

Supporters of Proposition C presented it as a referendum on the recently passed Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or health care reform. In reality, it only addressed a component of health care reform – the individual mandate.

The individual mandate is one of the least popular components of health care reform. It makes it a legal requirement that every American purchase health insurance (federal subsidies are available for those who cannot afford to do so). However, it is an important foundation for most of the popular components of reform.

For example, health care reform makes it illegal for an insurance company to drop or deny coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions. In other words, people will not lose their health insurance just for getting sick. This is a provision that most people across the ideological spectrum agree with. It also doesn’t work without the individual mandate.

Suppose Proposition C actually went into effect. Health insurance companies would still be required to provide coverage for people with pre-existing conditions, but Missourians would no longer be required to purchase insurance.

To understand why this is a problem, imagine a similar scenario in the car insurance industry. What if drivers were not required to purchase car insurance, but insurance companies could not deny coverage to anyone, even if someone were to apply for insurance the day after being in a car accident? People would take advantage of the system, waiting until they had a car accident to purchase car insurance. Similarly, if Proposition C were to go into effect, people would simply wait until they got sick to purchase health insurance.

All forms of insurance work the same way. A large pool of people pays into the system, covering each individual’s risk. This works well for health insurance if enough healthy people pay into the system to cover the costs of those who become sick. As the proportion of sick to healthy people in the insurance pool rises, the average risk for each individual in the pool rises, and costs go up. If people wait to purchase health insurance until they get sick, 100% of the people in the pool will be sick. The result is astronomically high premiums – the kind that the Missouri Hospital Association warned of as it encouraged Missourians to vote No on Proposition C.

Fortunately, Proposition C will probably be struck down in the courts due to the supremacy of federal law over state law. Still, the costs of Proposition C will be high. It forces the state of Missouri to go to court with the federal government, wasting countless state resources on court costs.

In the mean time, we are left to wonder why Republicans have been so supportive of Proposition C. Disagreeing with health care reform is one thing, but putting a reckless proposition on the ballot that could cause Missourians’ premiums to skyrocket, just to score some cheap political points? Disgraceful.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks

What Wall Street Reform Means for You

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks

2 Years of Progress

Our president has accomplished a lot so far. Midterm elections in November will decide if we will keep our momentum and continue to make progress, or if we will turn backward and lose the gains we have made.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks

OFFICIAL ENDORSEMENTS: AUG 3RD PRIMARY/SPECIAL ELECTION

The Saint Louis University College Democrats are proud to endorse the following candidates and propositions that will appear on the ballot for SLU students voting in the August 3rd Democratic Primary/Special Election:

For United States Senate: Robin Carnahan

Robin is the daughter of Mel and Jean Carnahan, former governor and senator of Missouri, respectively. She became Secretary of State in 2004 and was reelected in 2008 with more votes than any candidate for statewide office in Missouri history. As a consumer advocate, she has made significant strides cutting back financial abuse in Missouri. She has returned billions of dollars to would-be-victims of fraud throughout the state.

Robin has been a tireless advocate for our generation. She has demonstrated an understanding of our interests and concerns. Through her work to establish Missouri’s first statewide voter registration system, she has given young people a voice that they have never had before. Without her leadership in protecting college students’ rights as voters, it is unlikely that students at Saint Louis University would have gained access to their first on-campus polling place for the 2008 elections. That polling place turned out over 1000 SLU voters that would otherwise have had to walk miles and wait hours to vote.

Robin looked out for us as Secretary of State, and she will look out for us as a United States Senator. Check out her campaign website, get involved with the College Democrats, and we will send this amazing candidate to Washington!

(http://www.sludems.com/2010/01/05/2010-here-we-come/)

For State Auditor: Susan Montee

Since being sworn in as State Auditor in 2007, Susan has consistently demonstrated the traits of good and responsible governance. She has saved taxpayers millions of dollars by not only fighting waste and abuse across the state, but also by streamlining her own office to ensure that it functions as efficiently as possible. By creating an instantaneous electronic alert system, she has shown a commitment to transparency and allowed Missouri citizens to keep track of current audits.

Furthermore, Susan has worked closely with young Democrats across the state and ensured that they have a voice in Missouri government. We look forward to using that voice to reelect Susan as Missouri’s State Auditor. Check out her campaign website and let your voice be heard!

For United States Representative District 1: Lacy Clay

Representative Clay holds several prominent positions in the U.S. House of Representatives, including the chairmanship of the Subcommittee on Information Policy, Census, and National Archives. His work on the Census this year focused on counting traditionally under-counted minorities, ensuring that our country’s promise of equality will be carried out with fair representation. Rep. Clay has also been a strong and consistent voice for civil rights legislation during both his 17 years in the Missouri Legislature and his 4 terms in the U.S. House of Representatives. He will continue to be a resilient voice for progressive values when re-elected, and we happily give him our support. Check Rep. Clay’s website for more info about him and his campaign.

For State Representative District 58: James T. Morris

Representative Morris has been a powerful voice in the Missouri House since being elected in 2008. As a member of the Budget Committee, he took on the challenge of drafting the state’s budget at a time of economic struggle. He has been a fierce advocate for increased funding of public transportation in Saint Louis, successfully curbing layoffs and route cuts for the underfunded Metro system. Through his work to develop a more vibrant Metro system and his support of Missouri and Saint Louis’ poor and uninsured populations, Rep. Morris has demonstrated the kind of strong progressive values that the SLU College Democrats like to see in our State Representative.

For Clerk of the Circuit Court: Jane Schweitzer

The Circuit Clerk must have a relationship of respect and trust with judges in order to operate effectively, and Schweitzer has demonstrated the knowledge and ability to reconstruct those relationships that the incumbent has recklessly dismantled. She has promised renewed transparency and efficiency that is much needed in this position. View her website for more information.

NO on Proposition C

Proposition C seeks to overturn the groundbreaking reforms passed by the Obama administration in HR3590, the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.” After a year of work making sure that Americans can not be denied insurance protection because of pre-existing conditions, ensuring that children can stay on their parents insurance plans until the age of 26, and ensuring that no American will ever go bankrupt because they got sick, Proposition C will attempt to dismantle these critical reforms. While it is not likely to have its intended effect due to Federal supremacy, it does reflect poorly on Missouri and our state’s priorities. Rather than using our resources to create jobs and grow our economy, Missouri is spending all its time trying to pass symbolic measures to score political points with Tea Party radicals. Get out and vote for Missouri priorities, vote NO on Proposition C.

YES on Proposition S

Proposition S is a win-win. We invest in Saint Louis’ public schools and we do so without increasing property taxes. Proposition S will provide students with newly renovated facilities, a safe school environment, and a healthy education experience, and it will do so with funding from Federal subsidies. Our vote for Proposition C is all that is needed to invest in the next generation’s future.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks

August 3rd Primary Candidates and Propositions


U.S. Senator:

Francis J. Vangeli
Robin Carnahan
Richard Charles Tolbert

State Auditor:

Susan Montee
Abdul Akram

U.S. Rep. District 1:

Candice (Britt) Britton
Lacy Clay

State Rep. District 58:

James T. Morris
Penny V. Hubbard

Collector of Revenue:

Gregory F.X. Daly

License Collector:

Michael McMillan

Recorder of Deeds:

Sharon Quigley Carpenter

Clerk of the Circuit Court:

Jane Schweitzer
Mariano V. Favazza

Statutory Measure
Proposition C
Proposed by 95th General Assembly
(Second Regular Session) SS SCS HCS House Bill 1764


Shall the Missouri Statutes be amended to:

-Deny the government authority to penalize citizens for refusing to purchase private health insurance or infringe upon the right to offer or accept direct payment for lawful healthcare services?
-Modify laws regarding the liquidation of certain domestic insurance companies?

It is estimated this proposal will have no immediate costs or savings to state or local governmental entities. However, because of the uncertain interaction of the proposal with implementation of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, future costs to state governmental entities are unknown.

Yes – For the Proposition
No – Against the Proposition

School Bond Election
Transitional School District of the City of St. Louis
(St. Louis Public Schools)
Proposition S


Shall the Special Administrative Board of the Transitional School District of the City of St. Louis borrow money in the amount of One Hundred Fifty Five Million Dollars ($155,000,000) for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, renovating, repairing, improving, furnishing and equipping school sites, buildings and related facilities in the District, including but not limited to (1) removing lead paint and other hazardous materials at affected schools, (2) upgrading technology to modernize classrooms and improve academic performance, (3) improving building conditions and security systems to increase student safety and security, (4) upgrading school kitchens to improve student health, and (5) improving school playgrounds and athletic fields and facilities, and issue general obligations bonds for the payment thereof, resulting in no estimated increase in the debt service property tax levy? If this proposition is approved, the adjusted debt service levy of the school district is estimated to remain unchanged at the current rate of $0.6211 per one hundred dollars assessed valuation of real and personal property.

Yes – For the Proposition
No – Against the Proposition
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks

Check Out Our New Facebook Page!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks

President Obama’s Oval Office Address

The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
_______________________________________________________________________________

Remarks by the President to the Nation on the BP Oil Spill

THE PRESIDENT: Good evening. As we speak, our nation faces a multitude of challenges. At home, our top priority is to recover and rebuild from a recession that has touched the lives of nearly every American. Abroad, our brave men and women in uniform are taking the fight to al Qaeda wherever it exists. And tonight, I’ve returned from a trip to the Gulf Coast to speak with you about the battle we’re waging against an oil spill that is assaulting our shores and our citizens.

On April 20th, an explosion ripped through BP Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, about 40 miles off the coast of Louisiana. Eleven workers lost their lives. Seventeen others were injured. And soon, nearly a mile beneath the surface of the ocean, oil began spewing into the water.

Because there has never been a leak this size at this depth, stopping it has tested the limits of human technology. That’s why just after the rig sank, I assembled a team of our nation’s best scientists and engineers to tackle this challenge — a team led by Dr. Steven Chu, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist and our nation’s Secretary of Energy. Scientists at our national labs and experts from academia and other oil companies have also provided ideas and advice.

As a result of these efforts, we’ve directed BP to mobilize additional equipment and technology. And in the coming weeks and days, these efforts should capture up to 90 percent of the oil leaking out of the well. This is until the company finishes drilling a relief well later in the summer that’s expected to stop the leak completely.

Already, this oil spill is the worst environmental disaster America has ever faced. And unlike an earthquake or a hurricane, it’s not a single event that does its damage in a matter of minutes or days. The millions of gallons of oil that have spilled into the Gulf of Mexico are more like an epidemic, one that we will be fighting for months and even years.

But make no mistake: We will fight this spill with everything we’ve got for as long as it takes. We will make BP pay for the damage their company has caused. And we will do whatever’s necessary to help the Gulf Coast and its people recover from this tragedy.

Tonight I’d like to lay out for you what our battle plan is going forward: what we’re doing to clean up the oil, what we’re doing to help our neighbors in the Gulf, and what we’re doing to make sure that a catastrophe like this never happens again.

First, the cleanup. From the very beginning of this crisis, the federal government has been in charge of the largest environmental cleanup effort in our nation’s history — an effort led by Admiral Thad Allen, who has almost 40 years of experience responding to disasters. We now have nearly 30,000 personnel who are working across four states to contain and clean up the oil. Thousands of ships and other vessels are responding in the Gulf. And I’ve authorized the deployment of over 17,000 National Guard members along the coast. These servicemen and women are ready to help stop the oil from coming ashore, they’re ready to help clean the beaches, train response workers, or even help with processing claims — and I urge the governors in the affected states to activate these troops as soon as possible.

Because of our efforts, millions of gallons of oil have already been removed from the water through burning, skimming and other collection methods. Over five and a half million feet of boom has been laid across the water to block and absorb the approaching oil. We’ve approved the construction of new barrier islands in Louisiana to try to stop the oil before it reaches the shore, and we’re working with Alabama, Mississippi and Florida to implement creative approaches to their unique coastlines.

As the cleanup continues, we will offer whatever additional resources and assistance our coastal states may need. Now, a mobilization of this speed and magnitude will never be perfect, and new challenges will always arise. I saw and heard evidence of that during this trip. So if something isn’t working, we want to hear about it. If there are problems in the operation, we will fix them.

But we have to recognize that despite our best efforts, oil has already caused damage to our coastline and its wildlife. And sadly, no matter how effective our response is, there will be more oil and more damage before this siege is done. That’s why the second thing we’re focused on is the recovery and restoration of the Gulf Coast.

You know, for generations, men and women who call this region home have made their living from the water. That living is now in jeopardy. I’ve talked to shrimpers and fishermen who don’t know how they’re going to support their families this year. I’ve seen empty docks and restaurants with fewer customers -– even in areas where the beaches are not yet affected. I’ve talked to owners of shops and hotels who wonder when the tourists might start coming back. The sadness and the anger they feel is not just about the money they’ve lost. It’s about a wrenching anxiety that their way of life may be lost.

I refuse to let that happen. Tomorrow, I will meet with the chairman of BP and inform him that he is to set aside whatever resources are required to compensate the workers and business owners who have been harmed as a result of his company’s recklessness. And this fund will not be controlled by BP. In order to ensure that all legitimate claims are paid out in a fair and timely manner, the account must and will be administered by an independent third party.

Beyond compensating the people of the Gulf in the short term, it’s also clear we need a long-term plan to restore the unique beauty and bounty of this region. The oil spill represents just the latest blow to a place that’s already suffered multiple economic disasters and decades of environmental degradation that has led to disappearing wetlands and habitats. And the region still hasn’t recovered from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. That’s why we must make a commitment to the Gulf Coast that goes beyond responding to the crisis of the moment.

I make that commitment tonight. Earlier, I asked Ray Mabus, the Secretary of the Navy, who is also a former governor of Mississippi and a son of the Gulf Coast, to develop a long-term Gulf Coast Restoration Plan as soon as possible. The plan will be designed by states, local communities, tribes, fishermen, businesses, conservationists and other Gulf residents. And BP will pay for the impact this spill has had on the region.

The third part of our response plan is the steps we’re taking to ensure that a disaster like this does not happen again. A few months ago, I approved a proposal to consider new, limited offshore drilling under the assurance that it would be absolutely safe –- that the proper technology would be in place and the necessary precautions would be taken.

That obviously was not the case in the Deepwater Horizon rig, and I want to know why. The American people deserve to know why. The families I met with last week who lost their loved ones in the explosion — these families deserve to know why. And so I’ve established a National Commission to understand the causes of this disaster and offer recommendations on what additional safety and environmental standards we need to put in place. Already, I’ve issued a six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling. I know this creates difficulty for the people who work on these rigs, but for the sake of their safety, and for the sake of the entire region, we need to know the facts before we allow deepwater drilling to continue. And while I urge the Commission to complete its work as quickly as possible, I expect them to do that work thoroughly and impartially.

One place we’ve already begun to take action is at the agency in charge of regulating drilling and issuing permits, known as the Minerals Management Service. Over the last decade, this agency has become emblematic of a failed philosophy that views all regulation with hostility — a philosophy that says corporations should be allowed to play by their own rules and police themselves. At this agency, industry insiders were put in charge of industry oversight. Oil companies showered regulators with gifts and favors, and were essentially allowed to conduct their own safety inspections and write their own regulations.

When Ken Salazar became my Secretary of the Interior, one of his very first acts was to clean up the worst of the corruption at this agency. But it’s now clear that the problem there ran much deeper, and the pace of reform was just too slow. And so Secretary Salazar and I are bringing in new leadership at the agency — Michael Bromwich, who was a tough federal prosecutor and Inspector General. And his charge over the next few months is to build an organization that acts as the oil industry’s watchdog — not its partner.

So one of the lessons we’ve learned from this spill is that we need better regulations, better safety standards, and better enforcement when it comes to offshore drilling. But a larger lesson is that no matter how much we improve our regulation of the industry, drilling for oil these days entails greater risk. After all, oil is a finite resource. We consume more than 20 percent of the world’s oil, but have less than 2 percent of the world’s oil reserves. And that’s part of the reason oil companies are drilling a mile beneath the surface of the ocean — because we’re running out of places to drill on land and in shallow water.

For decades, we have known the days of cheap and easily accessible oil were numbered. For decades, we’ve talked and talked about the need to end America’s century-long addiction to fossil fuels. And for decades, we have failed to act with the sense of urgency that this challenge requires. Time and again, the path forward has been blocked — not only by oil industry lobbyists, but also by a lack of political courage and candor.

The consequences of our inaction are now in plain sight. Countries like China are investing in clean energy jobs and industries that should be right here in America. Each day, we send nearly $1 billion of our wealth to foreign countries for their oil. And today, as we look to the Gulf, we see an entire way of life being threatened by a menacing cloud of black crude.

We cannot consign our children to this future. The tragedy unfolding on our coast is the most painful and powerful reminder yet that the time to embrace a clean energy future is now. Now is the moment for this generation to embark on a national mission to unleash America’s innovation and seize control of our own destiny.

This is not some distant vision for America. The transition away from fossil fuels is going to take some time, but over the last year and a half, we’ve already taken unprecedented action to jumpstart the clean energy industry. As we speak, old factories are reopening to produce wind turbines, people are going back to work installing energy-efficient windows, and small businesses are making solar panels. Consumers are buying more efficient cars and trucks, and families are making their homes more energy-efficient. Scientists and researchers are discovering clean energy technologies that someday will lead to entire new industries.

Each of us has a part to play in a new future that will benefit all of us. As we recover from this recession, the transition to clean energy has the potential to grow our economy and create millions of jobs -– but only if we accelerate that transition. Only if we seize the moment. And only if we rally together and act as one nation –- workers and entrepreneurs; scientists and citizens; the public and private sectors.
When I was a candidate for this office, I laid out a set of principles that would move our country towards energy independence. Last year, the House of Representatives acted on these principles by passing a strong and comprehensive energy and climate bill –- a bill that finally makes clean energy the profitable kind of energy for America’s businesses.

Now, there are costs associated with this transition. And there are some who believe that we can’t afford those costs right now. I say we can’t afford not to change how we produce and use energy -– because the long-term costs to our economy, our national security, and our environment are far greater.

So I’m happy to look at other ideas and approaches from either party -– as long they seriously tackle our addiction to fossil fuels. Some have suggested raising efficiency standards in our buildings like we did in our cars and trucks. Some believe we should set standards to ensure that more of our electricity comes from wind and solar power. Others wonder why the energy industry only spends a fraction of what the high-tech industry does on research and development -– and want to rapidly boost our investments in such research and development.

All of these approaches have merit, and deserve a fair hearing in the months ahead. But the one approach I will not accept is inaction. The one answer I will not settle for is the idea that this challenge is somehow too big and too difficult to meet. You know, the same thing was said about our ability to produce enough planes and tanks in World War II. The same thing was said about our ability to harness the science and technology to land a man safely on the surface of the moon. And yet, time and again, we have refused to settle for the paltry limits of conventional wisdom. Instead, what has defined us as a nation since our founding is the capacity to shape our destiny -– our determination to fight for the America we want for our children. Even if we’re unsure exactly what that looks like. Even if we don’t yet know precisely how we’re going to get there. We know we’ll get there.

It’s a faith in the future that sustains us as a people. It is that same faith that sustains our neighbors in the Gulf right now.

Each year, at the beginning of shrimping season, the region’s fishermen take part in a tradition that was brought to America long ago by fishing immigrants from Europe. It’s called “The Blessing of the Fleet,” and today it’s a celebration where clergy from different religions gather to say a prayer for the safety and success of the men and women who will soon head out to sea -– some for weeks at a time.
The ceremony goes on in good times and in bad. It took place after Katrina, and it took place a few weeks ago –- at the beginning of the most difficult season these fishermen have ever faced.

And still, they came and they prayed. For as a priest and former fisherman once said of the tradition, “The blessing is not that God has promised to remove all obstacles and dangers. The blessing is that He is with us always,” a blessing that’s granted “even in the midst of the storm.”

The oil spill is not the last crisis America will face. This nation has known hard times before and we will surely know them again. What sees us through -– what has always seen us through –- is our strength, our resilience, and our unyielding faith that something better awaits us if we summon the courage to reach for it.

Tonight, we pray for that courage. We pray for the people of the Gulf. And we pray that a hand may guide us through the storm towards a brighter day. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks

March for Immigrant Rights

On Friday, Arizona passed a law that both requires immigrants to carry documents to verify their immigration status and gives law enforcement the authority to question anyone about their immigration status as long as they have “reasonable suspicion” that the person entered the country illegally. The law opens the door to racial profiling and persecution, and it is widely thought to be a violation of the United States Constitution.

Arizona is only the latest indicator that the United States needs just immigration reform now. A number of groups in Saint Louis will be demanding reform this Saturday:


On Saturday, May 1, 2010, thousands of United Methodist Women, in St. Louis for their Quadrennial Assembly, and key St. Louis community groups will march from America’s Center to Kiener Plaza and participate in a public faith-based vigil for immigrant, civil and human rights. Bishop Minerva Carcaño, chair of the United Methodist Task Force on Immigration, will lead the event.

In collaboration with local organizations like Missouri Immigrant and Refugee Advocates, Interfaith Committee on Latin America, National Farm Worker Ministry, Metropolitan Congregations United, Organization of Black Struggle, the Organization of Chinese Americans- St. Louis and African Mutual Alliance Assistance Association of Missouri, United Methodist Women will be joined by Nobel Peace Prize winner Rigoberta Menchú (invited) and interfaith leaders from the Muslim, Jewish and Catholic faiths including a representative of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese, Rabbi Susan Talve, Imam Muhamed Hasic, and UMC Bishop Robert Schnase .

The march and vigil will be a call to the St. Louis area and to the United States to keep families together, bring an end to detentions and deportations, protect workers’ rights, stop racial profiling, and show support of just immigration reform. Marchers will leave America’s Center at 11:30 am. The noon vigil at Kiener Plaza will include interfaith prayer, puppetista street theater and music.

The vigil will also be an opportunity for St. Louis community members and members of United Methodist Women from around the country to take action. A petition will be circulated calling for a city and county ordinance to outlaw racial profiling. Organizers will also collect postcards from participants affirming their support for the tenets outlined above to be delivered to Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano.

“When civil and human rights are violated in our community, it hurts everyone,” said Jennifer Rafanan, Director of Missouri Immigrant and Refugee Advocates. “We are excited about the impact that these actions will have for everyone living in our community – immigrants and non-immigrants, alike.”

United Methodist Women have been taking action around racial justice throughout their 140 year history. In 1952 they first adopted their Charter for Racial Justice, which was revised in 1978 with a particular focus on institutional racism. That year, United Methodist Women processed from the Assembly Hall in Louisville, Ky., and moved into the streets to sign the Charter.

“We are building on that history to again march out of the UMW Assembly into the streets to take action for racial justice,” said Carol Barton, Executive Secretary for Community Action. “On May 1st United Methodist Women will again take a visible stand challenging current policies of detention and deportation, supporting family unity, rights for migrant workers, and calling for an end to racial profiling and violence against migrant women. We will continue to call for just immigration reform.”

United Methodist Women is also calling for actions across the country, urging members who would want to participate but cannot be in St. Louis to organize public witness events in their own communities.

For more information from United Methodist Women contact: Yamil Anglada – (646) 522-6870 or (917) 776-9737. For more information in St. Louis, contact Jennifer Rafanan, Missouri Immigrant and Refugee Advocates (MIRA) – info@mira-mo.org, 314-644-0466 ext. 15 or Marilyn Lorenz, Inter-faith Committee on Latin America (IFCLA) – ifcla@ifcla.org, 314-721-2977.

For more info, check out the Facebook Event

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks