Monthly Archive for November, 2010

Lame Duck Coffee Party!

On Tuesday, November 30th at 7pm, join the Saint Louis University College Democrats for a coffee party at Cafe Ventana!

Both the semester and the 111th United States Congress are wrapping up, so we figured it was time to relax with some coffee and hang out with some SLU politicos!

Come by and offer your insights into some Lame Duck issues, from Don’t Ask Don’t Tell to the Bush Tax Cuts!

While you’re at it, come up with your own solution for the deficit (there may be a prize for the best one)

It’s never to early to start speculating on the GOP presidential nomination horserace!

Or, there’s always that pesky earnings tax issue showing up on the STL ballot in April.

Plenty to talk about with a great group of lefties! Please RSVP on Facebook! See you there!

Meeting Tomorrow!

We will have an important meeting tomorrow, Tuesday, November 16th at 7pm in the Busch Student Center Senate Chambers. With one election over, it is time to regroup and re-energize! With the municipal election just around the corner (April), it is more important than ever that we get SLU students to the polls to weigh in on issues like the Saint Louis earnings tax. Come to the meeting with your ideas on how we can boost voter registration, get students energized about voting, engage students in issues at the national, state, regional, and municipal level, and generally have a good time.

We will also have a brief discussion about next semester’s executive board and open positions that will need to be filled. If you are interested in an eboard position, make sure you come to the meeting!

Beyond Bias: Restoring Sanity to Our Media

From the pages of The Progressive Billiken:

The rise of 24-hour cable news and prime time commentary shows, along with the recent controversies surrounding Juan Williams, Rick Sanchez, and Keith Olbermann, have produced a growing public debate about the role and function of media in our society. While Sarah Palin laments the liberal bias of the “Lame-stream media,” organizations like Media Matters accuse the FOX News channel of functioning as a wing of the Republican Party. Unfortunately, they’ve all missed the point, and the media continues to fall into a death spiral. Jon Stewart, in his Rally to Restore Sanity, came closest to the truth when he declared before a crowd of 215,000 people (myself included) “We live in hard times, not end times. We can have animus without being enemies.” Stewart, unlike countless other media critics, recognized that the problem with media is much more pervasive and complex than bias. Bias is only a symptom of a disease that has plagued our media and threatens to dismantle responsible journalism.

To understand this disease, we must look beyond the bias wars. It is indisputable that FOX News, MSNBC, and CNN are all guilty of bias. I do not mean to suggest any false equivalency between these channels; I am only pointing out that bias exists to some degree in all of them. Rather than wade into the debate of which channel has the most bias, I want to examine the roots of bias, and the reasons that it plays a dominant role in our media. Journalists have always had bias; they are not robotic, impartial arbitrators. They are human beings, they have opinions, and they tend to vote. So the question must be asked, what about the media today allows these opinions, and personal biases, to become so obvious and dominant in political coverage? Once this question is asked, it becomes clear that the problem is not bias itself, but the way in which today’s media approaches journalism.

Turn on any cable news channel, and watch for an hour: CNN will show you a few thousand Tweets and Facebook posts anecdotally illustrating how Americans feel about the President, MSNBC will provide analysis explaining how Democrats will hold on to the White House in 2012, and FOX News will offer colorful commentary on the connections between America today and Russia prior to the Bolshevik Revolution. It is easy to only see the bias, but the real common thread is the dominance of process stories. In today’s 24-hour news cycle, 90% of the coverage is devoted to horserace politics, 9% is devoted to pretty graphics, and 1% is used for actually talking about substantive issues (unless a boy is trapped in a balloon in the sky). When the media focuses its attention on the horserace, it empowers bias.

The media’s coverage of health care legislation over the last year is a shining example of this problem. Health care reform addressed a number of systemic problems in our country’s health care system with complex regulations, oversight, and policy shifts. Rather than analyzing the problems with the current health care system, examining proposals to address them, and discussing the advantages and disadvantages of the individual components of legislation, the media chose to focus its coverage on the partisan bickering on Capitol Hill. Pundits amplified partisan talking points rather than digging deeper into the real issues at hand. More time was spent speculating on whether Democrats would pull together enough votes to pass the bill than on what was actually in the bill. While many pundits criticized lawmakers for not reading the bill, this criticism would have been better directed at journalists who were as ignorant about the bill’s content as anyone.

It is no wonder our electorate is so misinformed, our politics so divisive, and progress so difficult. We have traded our democracy for a game show. I am thankful for Jon Stewart for making a statement about the media, but we cannot stop with a comedian-led rally in Washington D.C. Furthermore, we cannot improve our media by pointing fingers and making accusations about those media sources that do not subscribe to our brand of bias. This perpetuates the problem — encouraging cable news channels to compete by producing the same crap in a different package.

We must demand accountability and responsible reporting. We must reinforce the most important pillar of our democracy, prioritizing quality news coverage over speculative process stories. We must stop giving our attention to pundits that scream the loudest and start listening to the journalists who prioritize substance over process, information over argument, and truth over presentation. As Jon Stewart put it, “If we amplify everything, we hear nothing.”

Progressives: The Dream Lives On

From the pages of The Progressive Billiken:

In the aftermath of Tuesday’s election, there will be plenty of pundits weighing in with their perspectives of what the results mean for Democrats. Rather than waste anyone’s time weaving a post-election narrative of my own, I want to offer a more personal message to my fellow progressives. We lost an election on Tuesday. It is not the first election we’ve lost, and it won’t be the last. But the stakes are too high, and the moment too great, to allow despair to darken our hearts. In the words of the late Ted Kennedy, “the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die.”

In 2008, young progressives rallied around a campaign that embodied the Audacity of Hope. Barack Obama offered charisma and leadership that we could identify with, but it was never about the candidate – it was about the dream. It was the dream that finally, our voices would be heard, that we would see an end to an unnecessary war, a renewed appreciation for our environment, a reinvestment in our broken education system, a commitment to providing health care for every American, a respect for the civil rights and human dignity of all people, a return to diplomacy and collaboration, and a rebuilding of the promise that every American be given the opportunity to succeed in our 21st century economy.

In our hearts, that dream lives on. It cannot be taken in a single election or a temporary setback. We do not yield and we do not falter. Our sight remains steadfast on the horizon; and at this moment of defeat, we stand united in hope.