Author Archive for Thomas Bloom

Some Great Upcoming Events on Campus:

1. The Great Issues Committee will host Michelle Rhee tomorrow (3/23) at 7pm in the Busch Student Center Wool Ballrooms EDIT: DUE TO A POWER OUTAGE, THE EVENT WILL NOW TAKE PLACE IN THE CHAIFETZ ARENA:

ST. LOUIS  Michelle Rhee will speak to students, staff and community members about her 18 years
of experience in the American education system and where that system needs to improve. Rhee began
her career in education in Baltimore, Maryland as a recruit of Teach For America. Rhee stayed with the
program for three years, teaching at a Harlem Park Community School within the city limits.

In 1997 Rhee founded The New Teacher Project, a non-profit organization that works to bring more
excellent teachers to classrooms across the country. Her work implemented widespread reform in teacher
hiring practices, placing 23,000 new, high-quality teachers in schools throughout Atlanta, Baltimore,
Chicago, Miami, New York, Oakland and Philadelphia.

In 2007, D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty selected Rhee to replace superintendent of D.C. public schools Clifford
Janey and become the schools’ new chancellor. Under her leadership, the worst performing school district
in the country became the only major city system to see double-digit growth in both their state reading and
math scores in seventh, eighth and tenth grades.

In 2010 Rhee resigned as chancellor and superintendent of D.C. schools and announced her new
movement, Students First, a political advocacy organizations aimed at education reform in the United
States.

Rhee has served on the advisory boards for the National Council on Teacher Quality, National Center for
Alternative Certification, and Project REACH. She has a Bachelor of Arts from Cornell College and a
Master of Public Policy from Harvard University.

The event will take place in the Wool Ballrooms in the Busch Student Center at 7 PM.

-Great Issues Committee

2. Rainbow Alliance is doing photo shoots for their 3rd Annual All of Us Campaign tomorrow and Thursday from 10am to 4pm in the SLU TV studio (BSC 247). The campaign seeks to empower straight allies in the movement for equality for all sexual orientations/gender identities. Check out the website for details.

3. Political Round Table will be hosting a discussion about “Revolutions in the Middle East and Northern Africa” on March 30th at 7pm in the Busch Student Center Wool Ballroom 171:

Discussion Questions: What justifies a revolution? If it is justified, then when do we need peaceful demonstrations? Violent revolutions? What is the nature of the relationship between governments and their peoples? How should the world respond to the protests occurring in the Middle East and Africa? How does this affect global politics?

-Political Round Table

ACTION ALERT: Protect Our Right to Vote!

Democrats,

I wanted to give you all a quick heads up about some legislation that will make it harder for SLU students to exercise our right to vote. A few bills that are currently moving through the Missouri General Assembly will impose rigid photo identification requirements at the polls. If passed, this legislation would eliminate the ability of SLU students to use our student IDs or out-of-state drivers’ licenses to vote.

While the legislation is intended to combat voter impersonation fraud, the Missouri Secretary of State has testified that there has never been a documented case of this type of fraud in Missouri.

I want to encourage you to sign an open letter to the Missouri General Assembly and Governor Nixon to express opposition to this legislation. It is available here: http://sites.google.com/site/slustudentsforvotersrights/

I would also encourage you to “Like” the Facebook Page SLU Students for Voters’ Rights.

Thanks, and I will see you all at our meeting tomorrow!

Thomas Bloom
VP – College Democrats

State of the Union 2011: Winning the Future

YDMO Announces Location of 2011 State Convention!

President Obama on the Tax Cut Agreement

Beyond Bias: Restoring Sanity to Our Media

From the pages of The Progressive Billiken:

The rise of 24-hour cable news and prime time commentary shows, along with the recent controversies surrounding Juan Williams, Rick Sanchez, and Keith Olbermann, have produced a growing public debate about the role and function of media in our society. While Sarah Palin laments the liberal bias of the “Lame-stream media,” organizations like Media Matters accuse the FOX News channel of functioning as a wing of the Republican Party. Unfortunately, they’ve all missed the point, and the media continues to fall into a death spiral. Jon Stewart, in his Rally to Restore Sanity, came closest to the truth when he declared before a crowd of 215,000 people (myself included) “We live in hard times, not end times. We can have animus without being enemies.” Stewart, unlike countless other media critics, recognized that the problem with media is much more pervasive and complex than bias. Bias is only a symptom of a disease that has plagued our media and threatens to dismantle responsible journalism.

To understand this disease, we must look beyond the bias wars. It is indisputable that FOX News, MSNBC, and CNN are all guilty of bias. I do not mean to suggest any false equivalency between these channels; I am only pointing out that bias exists to some degree in all of them. Rather than wade into the debate of which channel has the most bias, I want to examine the roots of bias, and the reasons that it plays a dominant role in our media. Journalists have always had bias; they are not robotic, impartial arbitrators. They are human beings, they have opinions, and they tend to vote. So the question must be asked, what about the media today allows these opinions, and personal biases, to become so obvious and dominant in political coverage? Once this question is asked, it becomes clear that the problem is not bias itself, but the way in which today’s media approaches journalism.

Turn on any cable news channel, and watch for an hour: CNN will show you a few thousand Tweets and Facebook posts anecdotally illustrating how Americans feel about the President, MSNBC will provide analysis explaining how Democrats will hold on to the White House in 2012, and FOX News will offer colorful commentary on the connections between America today and Russia prior to the Bolshevik Revolution. It is easy to only see the bias, but the real common thread is the dominance of process stories. In today’s 24-hour news cycle, 90% of the coverage is devoted to horserace politics, 9% is devoted to pretty graphics, and 1% is used for actually talking about substantive issues (unless a boy is trapped in a balloon in the sky). When the media focuses its attention on the horserace, it empowers bias.

The media’s coverage of health care legislation over the last year is a shining example of this problem. Health care reform addressed a number of systemic problems in our country’s health care system with complex regulations, oversight, and policy shifts. Rather than analyzing the problems with the current health care system, examining proposals to address them, and discussing the advantages and disadvantages of the individual components of legislation, the media chose to focus its coverage on the partisan bickering on Capitol Hill. Pundits amplified partisan talking points rather than digging deeper into the real issues at hand. More time was spent speculating on whether Democrats would pull together enough votes to pass the bill than on what was actually in the bill. While many pundits criticized lawmakers for not reading the bill, this criticism would have been better directed at journalists who were as ignorant about the bill’s content as anyone.

It is no wonder our electorate is so misinformed, our politics so divisive, and progress so difficult. We have traded our democracy for a game show. I am thankful for Jon Stewart for making a statement about the media, but we cannot stop with a comedian-led rally in Washington D.C. Furthermore, we cannot improve our media by pointing fingers and making accusations about those media sources that do not subscribe to our brand of bias. This perpetuates the problem — encouraging cable news channels to compete by producing the same crap in a different package.

We must demand accountability and responsible reporting. We must reinforce the most important pillar of our democracy, prioritizing quality news coverage over speculative process stories. We must stop giving our attention to pundits that scream the loudest and start listening to the journalists who prioritize substance over process, information over argument, and truth over presentation. As Jon Stewart put it, “If we amplify everything, we hear nothing.”

Progressives: The Dream Lives On

From the pages of The Progressive Billiken:

In the aftermath of Tuesday’s election, there will be plenty of pundits weighing in with their perspectives of what the results mean for Democrats. Rather than waste anyone’s time weaving a post-election narrative of my own, I want to offer a more personal message to my fellow progressives. We lost an election on Tuesday. It is not the first election we’ve lost, and it won’t be the last. But the stakes are too high, and the moment too great, to allow despair to darken our hearts. In the words of the late Ted Kennedy, “the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die.”

In 2008, young progressives rallied around a campaign that embodied the Audacity of Hope. Barack Obama offered charisma and leadership that we could identify with, but it was never about the candidate – it was about the dream. It was the dream that finally, our voices would be heard, that we would see an end to an unnecessary war, a renewed appreciation for our environment, a reinvestment in our broken education system, a commitment to providing health care for every American, a respect for the civil rights and human dignity of all people, a return to diplomacy and collaboration, and a rebuilding of the promise that every American be given the opportunity to succeed in our 21st century economy.

In our hearts, that dream lives on. It cannot be taken in a single election or a temporary setback. We do not yield and we do not falter. Our sight remains steadfast on the horizon; and at this moment of defeat, we stand united in hope.

LAST CHANCE TO REGISTER TO VOTE

TODAY IS THE VOTER REGISTRATION DEADLINE



Click the “Register to Vote” tab above to learn how to register. I will be registering voters in the Bean in the Busch Student Center until 3pm.

Dispelling the Myth of Apathy

From the pages of The Progressive Billiken:

In contemporary American politics, “youth vote” has become an oxymoron. Young people consistently fail to show up at the polls. We have been deemed too apathetic and disengaged for political activism. According to political strategists, engaging young people is a waste of time that could be better used on our grandparents – a more reliable voting bloc.

But why are we so quick to accept the idea that young people are apathetic? There is nothing in our genetics that indicates we are naturally lazy or disinterested. It seems absurd to explain away low participation among young voters by arbitrarily assuming none of us care. So I have a different theory: I think the idea of energized and active young people scares the shit out of people. When our generation shows up, we have incredible power to disrupt the status quo. As a result, we have been systematically removed from the political process.

In November of 2008, only 1000 out of 8000 undergraduate students at Saint Louis University voted in the presidential election. Imagine, however, that all 8000 had gone to the polls. Based on the election results in the 19th Ward, as well as exit polling data, we can make a conservative estimate that SLU students voted for Barack Obama by a 60-40 split. Had all 8000 undergraduates voted, assuming this 60-40 split, SLU students would have had a 4800 vote sway on the election. John McCain won Missouri by about 3500 votes in 2008.

Not convinced that SLU students have voting power? Take a look at the margin of victory in a few recent elections:

August 2010 Primary Election: Penny Hubbard won her race against incumbent James Morris for the State Representative in the 58th District by 304 votes.

August 2008 Primary Election: Robin Wright-Jones won her race against Rodney Hubbard for the State Senate in the 5th District by about 100 votes.

August 2004 Primary Election: Russ Carnahan won his race against Jeff Smith in the 3rd Congressional District by less than 1800 votes.

Conceivably, the student body of Saint Louis University controlled enough votes to choose their own State Representative, State Senator, and United States Congressman. SLU students are capable of having an impact – so why don’t we?

SLU students, and young people in general, are blocked from the political process in a number of ways. The most detrimental of these is misinformation. According to the Missouri Secretary of State, “if you are from another state and are attending college in Missouri, you have the option of registering to vote from your Missouri residence, or keeping your registration in your home state and voting by absentee.” However, most students are unaware that they can register to vote on SLU’s campus, and efforts to educate students about their voting rights have been extremely limited.

Before the 2008 presidential election, those students that did register to vote at their SLU address did not have a polling place on campus. They had to find time between their Tuesday classes to walk several blocks from campus to cast their ballots. This obstacle translated into low voter turnout – only about 50 SLU students voted in the 2008 presidential primary. Only when students began organizing and petitioning the university and the local board of elections did we finally obtain a polling place of our own.

Our experience at SLU reflects a national reality. Young voters are consistently disenfranchised in the political process, not only as a result of obstructions like the voter registration process, but also by the persistent removal of our voice from the political discourse. Our ideas are dismissed as idealistic and naïve because they challenge the status quo of American politics – a status quo characterized by leaders who become so entrenched in established schools of thought that become incapable of seeing beyond their own demagoguery.

We are not completely blameless – we have allowed ourselves to be relegated to the periphery of our politics. We have accepted and even embraced the perception of youth apathy. We have surrendered to the status quo without a fight. If we want to take America forward, we must organize our generation and demand to be heard, we must stop allowing accusations of apathy to become a self-fulfilling prophecy, and we must do what the entrenched forces of the status quo fear most: VOTE.

Una Now Accepting SLU Monologues Submissions

Una, the feminist voice at SLU, is preparing its second annual performance of the SLU Monologues. To learn more or to submit a monologue, check out the form below: